Engagement
eNPS: how to calculate your employee Net Promoter Score and what to do with the result
The formula and a worked example, ready-made survey questions, anonymity rules for small teams and a plan for what to do after you measure — so eNPS leads to change, not just another report.
In short
- eNPS is the share of promoters (scores of 9–10) minus the share of detractors (0–6). The result ranges from −100 to +100.
- The number on its own tells you little. Look at the trend from survey to survey and at the breakdown by department.
- Without an open "why" question, eNPS is useless: you'll learn that people are unhappy, but not what to fix.
- The real work starts after the survey: 2–3 actions, deadlines, owners and feedback to the team within two to three weeks.
What eNPS is and how to calculate it
eNPS (employee Net Promoter Score) is an employee loyalty index. It shows how willing people are to recommend the company as a place to work. The metric grew out of customer NPS and works the same way: one question, a 0 to 10 scale, three groups of respondents.
- Promoters — gave a 9 or 10. Ready to invite friends to join and defend the company in conversation.
- Passives — 7 or 8. Generally satisfied, but will leave if offered clearly better conditions.
- Detractors — 0 to 6. Unhappy, and most likely talking about it — to colleagues, friends, in employer reviews.
eNPS = % promoters − % detractors
Passives aren't part of the formula, but they count towards the total number of respondents. That's why percentages are calculated from everyone who answered, not from total headcount.
A worked example
Say a call centre in Astana has 52 operators and 40 of them responded. Of those, 18 gave 9–10, 14 gave 7–8 and 8 people gave 0 to 6.
| Group | Responses | Share of respondents |
|---|---|---|
| Promoters (9–10) | 18 | 45% |
| Passives (7–8) | 14 | 35% |
| Detractors (0–6) | 8 | 20% |
| Total | 40 | 100% |
eNPS = 45 − 20 = +25. It's written as a number without a percent sign: "eNPS +25".
Always state the response rate next to it: 40 out of 52, or 77%. If only a third of staff responded, the result describes the people who chose to answer, not the whole workforce.
How to word the question and what else to ask
Word the main question the same way every time, or you won't be able to compare results:
How likely are you to recommend our company as a place to work to a friend or acquaintance?
0 — definitely wouldn't recommend, 10 — would definitely recommend.
Don't switch to a 1–5 scale or add labels to every number: the formula is built for 11 points. Don't put the question at the end of a long survey — by item forty, people are answering on autopilot.
Open questions
Right after the score, you need at least one open question. That's where comments like "the evening shift has been short-staffed for two weeks" or "my manager only ever talks about numbers" show up. That's the material you make decisions with.
Follow-up questions — pick 1–3:
- Why did you give that score?
- What one change would make your work noticeably better?
- What do you like about working here that we shouldn't lose?
- What has been stopping you from working at your best over the past month?
- If you ran your department, what would you do first?
If you want more structure, add 3–5 closed questions on specific topics: workload, manager, pay and recognition, development, working conditions. Then the comments and scores will show which topic is dragging the index down. Keep the whole employee engagement survey to 3–5 minutes.
How often to run the survey
For most companies, eNPS once a quarter works well. That's enough to see the effect of changes without the survey turning into a routine.
- Once a year — too rare. Between surveys, managers change, key people leave, and you won't know what affected the number.
- Once a quarter — eNPS plus 1–3 open questions. A solid baseline.
- Once a month — a short pulse survey of 3–5 questions, where eNPS can alternate with questions on a specific topic. Works if the company is growing fast or going through big changes: an office move, a new schedule, a new manager.
There's a simple rule: don't launch the next survey until you've shown people what you did after the previous one. Otherwise each new score will be lower than the last — and the survey itself will be the reason.
New hires are worth surveying separately: they have a different starting point, and their answers are best viewed separately, broken down by tenure. If your company has high turnover, compare department eNPS with where people leave most often — read more about calculating it in our article on employee turnover.
Anonymity: how to keep it in a small team
If an employee suspects their answer can be traced back to them, they'll give an 8 and write nothing. The index will look decent and be useless.
In a company of 300 people, anonymity is easier to guarantee. The difficulties begin when a department has 4 people and the manager knows how each of them writes.
Anonymity rules for small teams:
- Set a threshold: group results are shown only if at least 5 people responded. If fewer, the data is merged with a neighbouring department or shown only in the company total.
- Don't slice by several attributes at once. "Warehouse, women, under a year's tenure" can easily narrow down to one person.
- Don't show managers response times or "who has already completed it" markers. Send reminders to everyone, not selectively.
- Pass comments from small groups to the manager as a summary by theme, not as quotes.
- Run the survey through a tool where HR can't see which person gave which answer, and say so directly in the invitation.
If the whole company is 15 people, you don't need a breakdown by department. Calculate overall eNPS and work with the open answers. For a team like that, an honest conversation at an all-hands meeting after the survey often gives more than the index itself.
How it works in TapHR
In the Engagement module, pulse surveys and eNPS are anonymous: employees answer from their phone in a couple of minutes. Results come together in a heat map by department, alongside the trend since the last survey and anonymous comments, and AI insights group them by theme: workload, manager, working conditions.
How to read the result
eNPS ranges from −100 (all detractors) to +100 (all promoters). A positive score means there are more promoters than detractors. Beyond that, it gets nuanced.
Don't look for a "normal market eNPS". The figures floating around the internet were collected in different countries, industries and in different ways. A warehouse with night shifts and an IT team of ten don't need to have the same score. Compare the company with itself.
What matters more than the absolute number
- The trend. +10 after +30 is a reason to dig in. +10 after −15 is noticeable growth, even if the number looks modest.
- The breakdown by department. An overall +25 can be made up of +50 in sales and +5 in the warehouse. The company as a whole is doing well, but the warehouse isn't.
- The structure of responses. An eNPS of 0 can come from 10% promoters and 10% detractors, or from 40% and 40%. In the second case the company is split, and that's a completely different situation.
- Response rate. If 50% of a department responded instead of the usual 90%, that's a signal in itself: people either don't believe in the anonymity or don't believe anything will change.
The threshold for a meaningful change is higher for small groups. In a department of 10, one employee moving from passive to detractor shifts the index by 10 points. Don't launch a post-mortem over a swing that comes down to one or two people.
What to do after the survey
A survey with no follow-through is worse than no survey at all: it teaches people that nobody cares what they think. Here's what to do after you measure.
- Sort the comments by theme. List 5–7 recurring themes and count how often each one comes up. Separately flag themes that concern specific departments.
- Choose 2–3 priorities. Don't try to fix everything. It's better to take one quick win (for example, water and air conditioning in the warehouse) and one systemic issue (for example, regular feedback from managers).
- Assign an owner and a deadline. Every action needs a named owner and a date. "HR will work on engagement" is not a plan.
- Discuss with department heads. Show them their results and ask them to come back with two actions of their own. If the problem is the manager, that's a one-on-one conversation between them and the HR director, not a topic for a general meeting.
- Give the team feedback. Within two to three weeks of the survey, tell people how many responded, what the result was, what you heard and what you'll do. Be honest about what can't be changed and explain why.
- Show the changes before the next survey. Before the new survey, briefly remind people what was done after the last one.
Template message to the team after the survey:
"Thank you for responding: 40 out of 52 people took part in the survey. Our eNPS is +25, up from +18 last quarter. Most of you wrote about being short-staffed on evening shifts and about manager feedback only ever being about numbers. What we're doing: by the end of the month we're adding two operators to the evening shift; from December, everyone will have a monthly one-on-one with their manager. What we can't change yet: salaries will be reviewed at the start of the year — we'll tell you about that separately."
If the comments show the problem lies with specific managers, it's worth adding a more precise tool to eNPS — for example, 360° feedback, where the manager is rated anonymously by their direct reports and peers.
Mistakes that make eNPS worthless
- Calculating the average score instead of eNPS. An average score of 7.5 and eNPS are different metrics. The average smooths things out; eNPS shows the imbalance between the satisfied and the dissatisfied.
- Changing the wording of the question. "Would you recommend the company" and "Are you satisfied with your job" get different answers. After a wording change, you have to start the trend from scratch.
- Linking eNPS to a manager's bonus. Then the manager will start "preparing" the team for the survey, and the index will stop measuring anything.
- Hunting for the authors of negative comments. One such case is enough to put an end to honest answers — in that department and the ones next to it.
- Surveying in the middle of a crunch or right after bad news. Run surveys at the same point in each quarter so the comparison is fair.
- Publishing department results as a ranking. A "best and worst department" table on the big screen turns the survey into a competition and the worst department into the guilty party.
- Going quiet after the survey. The most common and most costly mistake: the response rate drops next time, and there are fewer comments.
Where to start tomorrow
Checklist for your first eNPS survey:
- Lock in the wording of the main question and the 0–10 scale.
- Add 1–2 open questions: "why that score" and "what one thing would you change".
- Decide how you'll guarantee anonymity: the tool, a 5-response threshold for showing a department, no slicing by several attributes.
- Pick a date and a response window of 5–7 working days. Give managers advance notice.
- Write the invitation: why you're running the survey, who will see the answers, when you'll share the results.
- Put the results review meeting and the date for team feedback in the calendar in advance.
- Repeat with the same question a quarter later and compare the trend by department.
The first survey is a baseline, not a verdict on HR's work. Its value becomes clear with the second and third surveys, once there's a trend and you can see which actions moved it.


